Quote:
|
Which is it guys, if the posts aren't worthy then why post anything..... or are the posts worthy and you just can't seem to argue the points. If you have legitimate differing views air them. Instead we get attacks and told how stupid the article is, and subject changes...... hmmmmm why must they post if they can't add anything constructive?
|
Why? I'll tell you why.
The first time Bush = Hitler was issued we decimated that argument with facts.
The next time we did as well.
Same again.
Then again.
Then we'd see Bush and Hitler in the same sentence and we'd stop reading, cause we know everything they're going to say already.
Then yall pulled out stupid stuff, like how Bush sounds stupid speaking on his own and how he needs writers.
Then yall pulled out more stuff like how Bush wanted questions in advance so he doesnt sound stupid and needs to speak frankly.
Then it was Bush causes hurricanes and more crap.
Have you ever seen anyone on the Right start up threads about how Kerry = Hitler? No. We dont do it because it's stupid, indefensible, and it's a waste of time.
You want to know why we stop reading your posts all the way through? Because people post 18 different sources driving on about inane items.
Now dont take this wrong, it's not a personal attack on anyone. Host backs up his arguments completely. I respect him for taking the time, it's great for a debate, perfect for a thesis. However I'll pull out that same example, when he attacks someone for doing the exact same thing using polar arguments on how he's supposed to do the other... what's the point in reading it.
Whats the point in reading something from truthout? Do you read all of Coulter's last book? I didnt. Why not? The same reason I'll never pay to see a Moore film, 13 half truths dont make a full one.