Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Just wait until I start on Rumsfeld. Y'all will *really* need to threadjack to keep that discussion off track. But nice going, so far. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89931/899312f0c94c200dd9538bf916392300407f6212" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
|
I'm sorry Elphaba but for reasons pointed out there never was a thread to start with.
If you start 'on Rumsfeld' with the same type of opening the result will be the same. In the future I'd not recomend anything from truthout as starting material.
P.S. Laura Ingram is a hottie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
I'd add my support to Lieberman over McCain as well. I agree, McCain might have been nice in 2000, but now he'll do anything to keep up his maverick image and to get tv time. He's bought into his own hype. But unfortunately Lieberman will never get the chance to run as the Dems will most likely lead Hillary to slaughter (unless they pick some southern dem).
|
Saddly you are correct in that Lieberman would never have a prayer getting the democratic nomination. Outside of his backflips when he was with Gore, Liberman has been a stand up guy and would be better suited as an independent. I do differ in one aspect. McCain was a media whore in 2000 too.