|
It distresses me that someone can post an inaccurate point that is intended to counter the core point of the title and starter post of this thread, thus rendering it irrelevant, if the inaccurate point was reliable. It isn't.
Neither is the air of confidence that is intended by the poster and unavoidedly perceived by the reader who is not informed enough to know that Murtha had
not <b>"called for an immediate withdrawal".</b>
It further distresses me that objections are posted concerning my challenge to what amounted to an inaccurate "talking point", that was intended to kill the very valid premise that spurred the creation of the thread.
It is a holiday, I know, but is that an excuse to observe a hiatus of the everyday chore here of keeping discussion on a course where truth is at least in shouting distance? If not, what are we doing here?
Do we agree that the surest way to keep inaccurate and unsubstantiated points here to a minimum, is to vigorously challenge every one that is presented?
|