Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Convincingly to YOU, not to those of us who don't agree with your assesment.
For an evil neo-con like me, I don't really care, I would have supported the action to remove Saddam reguardless, but I saw no deception. Either the 12 years of intel was wrong or right. You can look back and say 'this guy said different, and this guy said this' etc but intel is never black and white, and the big picture said Saddam was working on WMD's.
|
I have posted a record of 'this guy said different, and this guy said this' that includes MSM news reports and a copy of Tenet's letter in response to Bob Graham's Oct. 4, 2002 request for declassification, the membership list of the senate intelligence committee in the 107th congress, and the voting data of five democratice intel committee members on the Oct. 11, 2002 resolution vote.
You have me at a decided disadvantage. I am detail oriented.
I have two questions for you:
1.) What is your evidence to accompany your statement that seems to convey your support for the veracity of the current Bush-Cheney message that "democrats are attempting to re-write history" , and "they saw the same intelligence on the Iraq threat that we saw"?
2.) Do you condone the broadcast of misleading and deceiving statments by members of the administration to achieve legislative approval for the invasion of Iraq, and if so, how do you propose to control the pattern of lies and deception that is now firmly entrenched as a way of "doing business" in this executive branch? You seem to condone "turning it on" to achieve backing for foreign policy goals. It's on.....the current disinformation "Op", the shrill and shameful political rants by the CIC in front of our troops. How do you turn it off. Do you care to turn it off?