Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Dude, I'm not the one starting 10 different threads on the same exact subject.
Do you wish to engage the point, or have the Democrats left you speechless too?
|
Do you wish to engage the point? Did you read the original post? I reread yours and honestly couldn't find a link between the original post and your host-esque deluge of information. Information which is completely tangential to the original post.
I'll bite though. How does this argument usually go? Something like: "It is obvious that george bush likes raping puppy dogs who are being forced to rape kittens while bathing in the blood of american soldiers, he also participates in some sort of diabolical plot involving the illegal selling of the world's petroleum reserves to aliens." Right? Is that what you expected? The standard response is usually something along the lines of, "Well, teddy kennedy and bill clinton also expressed the urge to rape puppy dogs who are being forced to rape kittens all while bathing in the blood of american soldiers and participating in some sort of diabolical plot involving the illegal sale of the world's petroleum supply to aliens so nannananna booboo." That's just paraphrasing though.
What do you think about the duty of a congressperson who isn't involved in raping puppy dogs who are being forced to rape kittens while bathing in the blood of american soldiers, and participating in some sort of diabolical plot involving the illegal selling of the world's petroleum reserves to aliens?
I think that a congressperson generally has to walk a fine line, balancing the whims of the easily persuaded sheeplike majority of their constituents with the solutions that actually might solve a problem or two.