View Single Post
Old 11-10-2005, 09:22 AM   #46 (permalink)
n0nsensical
Junkie
 
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade Frost
It seems to me like it's quite in line with the federal bill of rights:
You say that like I said it wasn't. I just think a religious interpretation of marriage is even stronger evidence that the state shouldn't be involved in its definition though such involvement may not be illegal per se.
n0nsensical is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62