Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redlemon
That is counter to everything that I have read on ID. ID, for example, states that the eye could not have evolved because it is irreducibly complex, and therefore the creation of it must have been guided by a designer. I agree that evolution does not explain the initial spark. But, ID is (as I understand it) about the guided design process, not the initial spark.
|
Alansmithee and stevo, I'm curious to read your response to this post by Redlemon. Everything I've read from the ID crowd emphasizes the intelligent DESIGN aspect, not the intelligent SPARK or CREATOR aspect. If you are saying that evolution leaves room for a creator to kick start, I'd have to agree with you. However, I don't think what you are defending is the same thing that the ID crowd is promoting. Have I missed something?