Pacifier

Then, who is the designer and who designed him?
ID (the theory formerly known as Creationism) is a not so smart attempt to get a religious foot into science.

Since ID is no science no scientist agrees with ID. Anyone who thinks that ID is a valid scientific theory is no scientist.


Unless of cource you accept alchemy as science too, maybe the "philosopher's stone" wasn't such a wierd idea.
Or your Idea of sex education is telling stories about the stork

__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein