Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pan6467
Actually Stevo, I brought Clinton into it in my first post by saying I really find it hypocritical that the people so willing to fry Clinton are turning blind eyes and defending Bush. And it is very true.
This wasn't a thread to compare the 2 either, it was to point out another Bush scandal and see what defense there was from the Bush followers here and why after scandal upon scandal this behavior is ok from the president, all of a sudden. And so far there hasn't been any defense but to turn and attack.
To me no defense means it's blind following and a blank check because these people truly do not care about what is right or wrong just who has the power.
This wasn't to be a thread to compare the 2 though, it was to ask why were these people so willing to destroy the presidency, spend billions upon billions to investigate everything he did, and pretty much bring the country to a standstill while they prosecuted him, while these same people do nothing about Bush.
And any Dem who points anything out gets attacked for "sour grapes" or "this won't go away will it nothing there..." or etc.
Yet it is scandal after scandal after scandal in this administration, with proof of wrongdoing, questionable ethics and lieing to the people and congress.
|
So when I start to post why I laugh at the left for this attempt at plamegate, and show how it is all bogus, with documented sources even, for some reason it is ignored almost whole-heartedly by the left on this board. Clinton is brought into it, a sentance here or there that isn't central to my main point is attacked. Now we see who is really dancing around the issue. Maybe the reason the same people who investigated clinton aren't doing it here isn't because bush has some free-pass, but because they've looked at the evidence and decided it wasn't worth their time.