Originally Posted by shakran

Wow. I'll give this to you. You're very good. You almost had everyone fooled into thinking that was the point I addressed in my post to you. Unfortunately, this is what I was replying to, NOT whether or not Bush lied:




You have no evidence that this is baseless, you have no evidence (hint: Rush Limbaugh does not count as evidence) that it's just petty bullshit from the left, yet you claim it to be.




Because your unbiased source said nothing whatsoever about what you were talking about in the statement that I replied to.





Yes, which means he was put on trial, and then his case was "torn apart" when it came before congress. He was impeached, but was not convicted. Did you have a point with that? Or are you trying to say that anything Bush does, no matter how smarmy, is OK because a democrat back in history got impeached? Are you planning on using Clinton's impeachment as the excuse for any wrongdoing committed by your party for the rest of your life? I frankly hope not - that would be pretty pathetic.