View Single Post
Old 11-04-2005, 01:31 PM   #8 (permalink)
Redlemon
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
From the bottom of the link in the original post:
Quote:
What in the World is a Planet Anyway?

With the recent discoveries of Sedna and now 2003 UB 313 at distances from the Sun well beyond those of the “traditional” planets that we all learned in elementary school, the question: “What is a planet?” has taken on added significance.

There is a diverse range of objects populating our solar system, and many objects are clearly not planets. These include: comets, asteroids (sometimes called minor planets), satellites, dust grains, charged particles, planetesimals and of course the sun. But what is it that makes a planet a planet?

Some have argued that Pluto does not fit the bill as a planet given its small size and highly eccentric, greatly inclined orbit.. However, it is countered that Pluto has a satellite like other planets, it orbits the sun like other planets and it is made up of planet-like material. Therefore, it is a planet. So where does that leave objects like 2003 UB 313?

Many of the same arguments that have been used to “demote” Pluto from planet status are also being used on 2003 UB 313 (as well as Sedna and similar objects), even though these arguments have not made much progress and often just cloud the issue with semantics.

Many of the same arguments that have been used to “demote” Pluto from planet status are also being used on 2003 UB 313 (as well as Sedna and similar objects that now number four).

The main differences between 2003 UB 313 and Pluto are: it is probably a bit bigger than Pluto, it is located in the Kuiper Belt about 3-times further from the sun than Pluto, and the inclination of its orbit is about 44° with respect to the plane of the solar system. (Note: 44° is a very high inclination, the second highest is of Pluto at 17°. One of the reasons UB 313 has not been discovered until now is because it was not believed that Kuiper Belt objects could have such a large inclination to the ecliptic.)

Given the fact that there is not a consensus on Pluto’s status, it is unlikely that there will ever be agreement on 2003 UB 313 or other objects like it. Suffice it to say that we are learning a lot more about our solar system and there will probably be more surprises as we explore to even greater depths.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360