Quote:
Originally Posted by politicophile
Link
If Host is right about this one, it just goes to show you how little the Democrats care about winning the war in Iraq and how incredibly gullible they were back when the war was still under discussion. Read on...
|
So, suppose the President of the USA says "I have evidence that Iraq has WMD, and is planning on using it, in allegance with the people who backed the attacks on the WTC on Sept 11th".
He's the President. He's speaking on a matter of national security. You don't expect him to be making bald-faced lies.
If the POTUS lied about the evidence he had prior to the war, is it the fault of the minority party in the Senate and Congress to catch his lies?
It is possible for the executive branch in cahoots with the majority party in both houses to hoodwink the minority party in both houses. It isn't ideal.
I suppose it is your position that it is better to follow the liars, than the people the liars fool?