Quote:
Originally Posted by rsl12
Just to clarify the discussion, I'd like to give a few formal definitions. Some people seem to be mixing up definitions, particularly those of 'agnosticism' and 'skepticism':
Agnostic - An agnostic is one who believes there is insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the existence or nonexistence of God or gods. Agnostics criticize the theist and the atheist for their dogmatism and their presumption of such knowledge.
Athiest - An atheist is one who believes that there exists positive evidence that there is no God. To the atheist, all of existence can be explained naturally rather than supernaturally. An atheist is convinced that all religious belief, evidence, and faith are false.
Skeptic - The skeptic neither affirms nor denies God's existence. And in contrast to the (hard) agnostic, the skeptic does not say it is impossible to know. For (hard) agnosticism too is a form of dogmatism -negative dogmatism. The skeptic claims to take a much more tentative attitude toward knowledge. He is not sure whether a man can or cannot know God. In fact, the complete skeptic is not sure of anything.
Read more here:
http://www.greatcom.org/resources/ha...01/default.htm
|
There is a new religion that is like skepticism. It's called Universism.
But I'm glad people (not just the person quoted) did put actual definitions. It means we can have an informed debate.
I think that it is a valid answer. Just look at the definition.