|
Pragma,
"Furthermore, just because the individual in question didn't specify a time doesn't mean that the Secret Service shouldn't investigate him - a complaint was filed, and so they have regulations to follow and so they investigated him. They found no cause for indictment, gave him a verbal warning, and went on their way. End of story."
This sounds like a bunch of crap to me. I did not get the impression any actual complaint was filed at all. (If there was one, why is Wal-mart the one that gets to decide if the photo-clerks name is made public? It would be a matter of public record if he filed a complaint.) No crime was commited, they were investigating someones veiws not his actions.
Also, "I was just following orders" is the shortest path to a tyranny i can think of.
|