Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Spartak · 10-24-2005, 10:09 PM

I remember reading an article on TSN about how a university carried out tests with the modern NHL visors, which basically called bullshit on the whole "impeded vision" argument.

It shouldn't be mandatory I don't think, but players should forfeit their salary for as long as they are injured as a result of not wearing one.

In the salary cap era GMs should also be given cap relief if one of their players goes down with a visor-preventable injury... but only if the player agrees to wear a visor for the rest of the season when he comes back.

Yes that'll do.

10-24-2005, 10:09 PM	#10 (permalink)
Spartak Bang bang Location: New Zealand	I remember reading an article on TSN about how a university carried out tests with the modern NHL visors, which basically called bullshit on the whole "impeded vision" argument. It shouldn't be mandatory I don't think, but players should forfeit their salary for as long as they are injured as a result of not wearing one. In the salary cap era GMs should also be given cap relief if one of their players goes down with a visor-preventable injury... but only if the player agrees to wear a visor for the rest of the season when he comes back. Yes that'll do. __________________ I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...