|
I remember reading an article on TSN about how a university carried out tests with the modern NHL visors, which basically called bullshit on the whole "impeded vision" argument.
It shouldn't be mandatory I don't think, but players should forfeit their salary for as long as they are injured as a result of not wearing one.
In the salary cap era GMs should also be given cap relief if one of their players goes down with a visor-preventable injury... but only if the player agrees to wear a visor for the rest of the season when he comes back.
Yes that'll do.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
|