View Single Post
Old 10-24-2005, 08:17 AM   #15 (permalink)
canuckguy
I read your emails.
 
canuckguy's Avatar
 
Location: earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr
How is that a personal attack when ,given the attitude you presented about assuming he was a child rapist, you would be a completely biased juror? Biased jurors are a diesease in America.

umm, well I would hope that if I was sitting on a jury that I would have more facts at my disposal to make a educated decision and not just a post on a freaking internet forum! and like my previous post said that we did not know all the info, but by going by the article since they are removing a child i would assume (right or wrong) he was a child sex offender. How many stories do we read that say sex offender, with child being removed from a home and the sex offence was he raped a 30yr at a party? Too much to assume.
canuckguy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73