Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brian1975
omg, I am sorry but fuck I don't even know why I bother to read these threads. Everytime there is a thread about sex offenders it turns into the teenage boy having sex with his teenage girl friend why it should not be listed as a sex offence. Yes I think we can all agree that it is stupid for the boy to be listed as a sex offender!
Can we just assuming that since they are taking a CHILD, out of the house that he is a child sex offender and not a normal rapist.
|
No we can't assume that. jesus.. I'm not sure if you live in America but if you do I hope to god allah satan or whatever the fuck is out there that you never serve on a jury. I'm not attacking you but seriously, a Child was taken out, ok so what about the mother? Should we assume she's still a crackhead and she's gonna get her kids killed because she has a history of drugs? Or maybe she'll get into a wreck because she's trying to hit a rock while she's driving. Assuming is pure bollocks. This is why people need facts and this is why I hate sensationalist media. It does nothing but breed this type of attitude. Oh well.. I guess since the person was arrested I assume that they did it..blah blah blah. You know here it's supposed to be innnocent until proven guilty. Ok ok I digress this really doesn't fit this article. We know the guy was guilty.
perhaps you should read your other post
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brian1975
But you never know if it was a wrong conviction or if he truely has turned his life around..
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brian1975
20 years ago and he has not been arrested is along time.
|
again.. don't whine about getting attacked..this is merely a counter against your claim of assumption.. kthanx