Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redlemon
Arrrrgh. His statement makes perfect sense, if you can handle more than a 10 second sound bite. He voted for an authorization bill that contained certain provisions, and it didn't pass. He didn't vote for the next authorization bill, because he disagreed with other provisions in the new bill.
Why is that so hard to understand?
|
It was the context in which he made this statement. He was pressed for an answer by the media and this is the BS that spewed forth. If he was any better at speaking he would have said that he voted against it the second time because of a and b and c.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|