Originally Posted by host

My "call" to "impeach" Bush, was a followup to "breaking news" from Fox. Here we have a major network that acts as an extension of the white house press office, instead of as an investigative news agency, when it comes to it's "coverage" of Bush's presidency. If Fox "reports" about Rove's fourth trip to testify before Fitzgerald's grand jury, it will be in the most favorable light that is possible under these disturbing set of circumstances. Forgive me for my cynicism when it comes to Fox, the abdication of a constitutional duty of congress to oversee and attempt to hold the executive branch in check, and the predictable reaction of Bush/Rove supporters to downplay the risk to Rove, when he is reported to be the reason that a special prosecutor was assigned to this investigation, in the first place.

<b>Folks....my "impeach Bush !!!" remark is the mirror opposite, at this stage, of remarks subsequently posted that indicate belief in the false premise that Rove is simply "co-operating" with Fitzgerald's investigation, to "clear up" this matter.</b> I admit that my "impeach" remark is, at this stage, improbable.