I fail to see how this can be viewed as anything other than Rove saying, "No problem. I'll testify again; I have nothing to hide."
How does this article, in and of itself, show Rove scambling to avoid indictment or, for that matter, to be guilty of a treasonous act?
Time will tell if he is guilty or not, but this just appears to be the result of an ongoing investigation.
The thread title seems, to me at least, to just barely contain a sense of manic glee. And to be somewhat overstated.
__________________
Bad Luck City
|