Quote:
|
Originally Posted by j8ear
I'm going to overlook your rediculous religious bigotry and get straight to the heart of the matter:
1. OF COURSE the federal government is doing everything it can to enforce the laws it enacted and is CHARGED WITH ENFORCING.
2. I think the controlled substances act and just about every extension of both the commerce clause and the compelling government interest principle is way out of whack of with the spirit, the letter, the intent and all common sense as far as constitutionality goes.
3. It is extremely amusing to hear a liberal whine about state's rights. Ironic, amusing, and frankly, concerning. Concerning because I suspect the irony is lost, and the hypocracy is justifiable.
|
1. Not when those laws violate the ultimate law, the Constitution.
2. Then we agree.
3. I don't even know what you're trying to say here. I suspect you're being purposefully ambiguous because you don't really have much to say and just want to take a personal shot. I'm also not sure where you got the idea I'm a liberal because I'm much more libertarian.
__________________
"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded." --Abraham Lincoln
|