|
I may be stupid here - it wouldn't be the first time. But I just don't understand what is wrong with restricting where protesters go to protest.
JinnKai, if the "25 'pro-Bush' citizens stood along the curb" got close enough to Bush to hurt him without first being vetted, then that would be bad.
Regardless of Bush's many flaws, I like the idea of telling people "protest far enough away from him so that it would be hard for you to kill him."
Of course, the fact that Bush and other national monuments were not actually in the area when the protestor was restricted would be bad if it were policy. That doesn't seem to be the case.
|