Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBen931
STOP RIGHT THERE. We humble cyber-citizens of the TFP proclaim long and loud that we are inclusive, we are not racist, nor sexist, nor discriminatory in any way. Then you see a picture of the perpetrator and what happens? The whole perspective changes. In My Humble Opinion, she could very well be a pedophile.
What if she looked 'shifty'? What then?
I think this law (and the breaking of it) really says something about what we have let our society become. I think that taking her photo to make her look innocent is a shameful thing.
Not the poster of the picture. I am not trying to flame you, flstf. I think that the photographer should have stopped and asked "what does it matter what she looks like?"

|
This law is probably supported by a lot of people. It's intent is to protect children from pedophiles. Most people probably think they are only arresting the bums, etc or like Ustwo said
Quote:
Nothing like taking your kid to the park while getting eyed by someone who smells like pee and is picking through the trash looking for cold french fries.
|
I think what the reporter/photographer is trying to show by publishing her picture, is that anyone (even their readers) who do not see/read the park rules and take a seat on one of the benches is subject to arrest and possible jail time. Also the woman was probably wanting the publicity.