I'd drop the three principles myself, but find the idea of a darwinistic approach to belief quite pleasing.
I think
Quote:
|
Good (rational) beliefs have positive outcomes for people. Bad (irrational) beliefs have negative outcomes.
|
is a reasonable statement, but it doesn't really say anything new. Are we talking long-term, or short-term? I suppose survival is the deciding factor (hence my use of the term Darwinistic) but I don't think you'll ever get a room full of people to come to a consensus on which beliefs are more likely to be 'adaptive' or 'mal-adaptive' since survival depends on the system in which you are living i.e you just can't do it except with hindsight, and even then it's tricky.
It's a call for adaptive relativism/pragmatism, which the Chinese came up with (among others) more than 3000 years ago.