Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
I also would have laid money down in Vegas (assuming I could have found a bookie stupid enough to take the bet) that Kennedy and Feinstein would vote no out of political spite.
|
I'm not sure that "political spite" is the best term to use. I think of it as political realism, the understanding that Supreme Court appointments are political decisions whether it should be that way or not.
From a proscriptive standpoint, the judiciary should be independent of politics. However, the reality of the situation is that Democrats have a stake in preventing reasonable conservative nominees from being confirmed.
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
|