Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

recogt · 09-23-2005, 11:57 PM

I am the founder of RECOG-T.
this is an acronym for

Rational Emotive Cognitive, Theory
Therapy
Training

You choose.

recogt has gone beyond it's original purpose which I will explain later.
For now the following is part of the core philosophy of the system.

Core belief 1. No cause is worth dying for.
Core belief 2, No cause is worth killing for.
Core belief 3, I forced to choose, we will probably choose core belief 2.

The system is rational, individualy hedonistic in that it emphasises the survival of the individual in order to ensure the survival of the group (Race, Species etc).

recogt eschews all racial, religious, national, political or any other division of people and holds that all people are beyond evaluation as good, bad or anything in between.

What recogt evaluates is belief ( adaptive or mal-adaptive) and the consequences of these beliefs.

Thus we do not judge the believer as good or bad but rather what is believed.

Good (rational) beliefs have positive outcomes for people. Bad (irrational) beliefs have negative outcomes.

This is a small and tentative step for recogt.

I wellcome your thoughts.

Gareth.

09-23-2005, 11:57 PM	#3643 (permalink)
recogt Upright	recogt phillosophy I am the founder of RECOG-T. this is an acronym for Rational Emotive Cognitive, Theory Therapy Training You choose. recogt has gone beyond it's original purpose which I will explain later. For now the following is part of the core philosophy of the system. Core belief 1. No cause is worth dying for. Core belief 2, No cause is worth killing for. Core belief 3, I forced to choose, we will probably choose core belief 2. The system is rational, individualy hedonistic in that it emphasises the survival of the individual in order to ensure the survival of the group (Race, Species etc). recogt eschews all racial, religious, national, political or any other division of people and holds that all people are beyond evaluation as good, bad or anything in between. What recogt evaluates is belief ( adaptive or mal-adaptive) and the consequences of these beliefs. Thus we do not judge the believer as good or bad but rather what is believed. Good (rational) beliefs have positive outcomes for people. Bad (irrational) beliefs have negative outcomes. This is a small and tentative step for recogt. I wellcome your thoughts. Gareth.