Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asaris
Analog -- what you give isn't really an argument, it's an explanation. You write "I believe this because it is the result of my logical answer from many periods of thought." What in these periods of thought led you to believe you could quantify (at least in theory) how strong one's impulses of good and evil are? And what makes you think they're more static than dynamic?
|
Oh no, I was by no means saying that people's impulses are static. Obviously people's emotions and impulses change frequently.
Also, seeing as everything is theoretical and nothing about "good" and "evil" can be proven in any way, then pretty much every argument is a person's experiences (or expertise) and opinions presented as a method of reasoning.
I can't think of a better way to get my point across.
