|
I say congratulations to spike for coming up with this inspired idea - I just don't think it goes far enough. Why only limit ourselves to only killing murderers and sex offenders?
In fact, why limit ourselves to killing people <b>after</b> they've committed a crime? Some people are statistically more likely to be criminals based on their upbringing, it would be far more economical to test them at school to see if they are starting to exhibit criminal, anti-social, or anti-American behaviour, and if they don't pass, we could execute them before they start causing trouble.
It would save so much money in prison fees, police fees and prevented property damage, which would result in much lower insurance costs for the rest of us, plus it would be a positive encouragement for all children from more troubled areas to sort themselves out and start behaving properly.
|