Quote:
Originally Posted by politicophile
This is a bit off topic, but the Constitution is, and has always been, a document for restricting the government. That said, the purpose of laws is (generally) to restrict the people. The Constitution simply sets limits on what sorts of limits the government is allowed to enact on us.
Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This is the justification for the "right to privacy". The question, then, is two-fold: is the right to privacy actually a right that the government is not permitted to enfringe upon, and is criminalizing abortion a violation of the mother's privacy?
Neither answer is obvious to me at this point in time.
|
As I see it, this 'right to privacy' could be handled in the same manner as people are trying to deal with 'gay marriage'. Amend the constitution....but remember, if we amend the constitution to remove privacy, we're all doomed.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|