Prior to O'Connor and Rehnquist leaving, Roe would have been upheld by 6-3. Presumably, O'Connor will remain on the court for the coming term. Rehnquist was one of the three who would have voted to overturn, so the balance, for the time being, will remain safely at 6-3 in the worst case scenerio for pro-choicers.
Even when O'Connor is replaced, there is no way Roe could be overturned, so abortion is safe... at least until the next Justice steps down.
Additionally, I am not at all convinced that Roberts is interested reversing that particular precident. As a moderate Republican myself, I am hopefull that Bush overestimated Roberts' conservatism and we end up with someone slightly to the left of Rehnquist, as opposed to a friend for Scalia.
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
|