Quote:
Originally Posted by aberkok
To spring to ngdawg's defense, she didn't post an anti-male stance. She was just balancing the issue. Nobody had questioned wolf's persistence upon having anal sex until she posted. We were all taking for granted that he was entitled. Ngdawg was merely bringing up something that had been overlooked and I do not at all see anything there that is anti-male.
|
To spring to mine... yeah, she did. Nobody questioned his persistence because that wasn't his question nor the crux of his issue. His issue is about his wife calling him "gay" because he likes having sex "with her ass" so much. As much as it "hurts" and she's coming from a "woman's perspective", there are plenty of males who thoroughly enjoy anal sex, or find it uncomfortable and do it anyway. Being a woman isn't what it's about, it's about people who find something uncomfortable to do with their SO and expressing themselves in that vein. The thread starter's wife has chosen to call him gay because he enjoys anal.
"So, I have to ask-are YOUR wants more important than hers? Is there something WRONG with her pussy that it comes a distant second to what you enjoy? Personally, I'd feel like that's what you're implying if I were she....."
This is where the words turn the argument against him for no particular reason. There's no reason for this sort of affront. This line of questioning could also have been phrased differently so it's not righteous indignation at his character. Nobody questioned his persistence because he gave no indication he's persistent, or how persistent. For all we know, she's calling him obsessed because he mentions it once a month, once every 6 months. Any amount can be seen as obsessing from the point of view of a person who doesn't enjoy said activity.
And considering the wife is the one hurling slurs at him by calling him gay (and using it as a negative), I'm not inclined to give her side of the story a lot of extra room for consideration.