View Single Post
Old 09-08-2005, 03:54 PM   #59 (permalink)
texxasco
Insane
 
Location: Somewhere in East Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
So... even though there's no way anyone, anywhere, could ever tell who the picture is of, that somehow should still prevent them from using it, as next of kin can't be told?
You got it. I think it is disrespectful, and shows poor taste. I have read that people believe that the pic is just reality, and we should be ok with it. I see their point, and I also know that the U.S. is in love with reality. Reality this, reality that. One reality show after another. I guess I am just a little too conservative in my views to be ok with picking up a newspaper, or turning on the news, and having to look at a dead body. Maybe my opinion would be different if I thought the reason for showing the picture was something other than generating ratings and/or profits. Cal me closed minded, and in that regard I guess I am, but I just can't see why a person needs to look at a photo of another person. It isn't neat, or interesting. It's sad and tragic

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Well... since this entire thread is about the photo in question, and not imaginary photos or some other photo elsewhere, I again don't understand what you're driving at.
Ok, I'll be specific. The picture you posted should not have been on the front page, or any page of the newspaper. I think it is wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
I think half the point being made in this thread is that people shouldn't feel satisfied to be so sanitized and disconnected from the realities of the world. While this may suffice for you, I think it is a poor way, in general, to water down the atrocities that have occured.
I don't think that not showing images of dead bodies sanitizes us, or disconnects us from the realities of the world. We all have our own reality and experiences, etc. I work amoungst criminals. I have not only seen, but witnessed stabbings, beatings, and other assorted things in my days, and you know...after awhile people tire of seeing that stuff. I've had to fight with, detain, restrain, and basically babysit bad guys for so long that when I am off work these days, I'm not looking for reality. I get plenty on a daily basis. I'm, not bragging, nor complaining, but that's my reality. You aren't old enough to have experienced it... but I am a 60's child, and I got to live (as a kid) in the 70's when life was more upbeat, and not so negative. Back then, to run a picture such as the one being discussed, on the front page of a newspaper might have cost someone his or her job. You didn't see boobs on TV either back then (I like this new trend). And, back then I would have thought it was cool, cutting edge, etc. But you know what? Society changes, you will change, I definitely have changed (so much that I suprise myself sometimes). Life changes. Reality never changes, but our take on it usually does with time. Society has become so de-sensitized that people are used to seeing things like that picture. Let me give you an example...

We've all been in the car with the folks, or others, and while on the road we pass an accident scene. I can remember back when I was a kid, that an accident on the side of the road was no big deal, in that we didn't need to see it to believe it. We'd say something like I hope they're ok and keep on going. People were more respectful, and wouldn't want to impose by being nosey. Now, it is an almost daily occurance when driving down the road, an accident (off the road, not blocking traffic) causes traffic to slow down for miles. Why? People just can't get enough of reality.... They GOTTA see what happened, and even at the risk of causing ANOTHER accident.

It seems like with each decade that goes by, society becomes a little more lenient as to what we deem acceptable, and not acceptable. Look.... I can tell you are a very articulate, and intelligent person. I can tell by the way you write, and what you write about. You'd have a hard time convincing me that you wouldn't have gotten a good grip of the reality of the situation in New Orleans without that picture. I think it is possible that you are confusing your needing to see that picture with wanting to see that picture. You don't need to see that picture to make you understand what is going on. You want to see that stuff. And, that's alright. The stuff is gonna be in the papers, on the tv, etc. I accept that, but I don't like it. I always have the option of not looking at the picture, or changing the channel... It is an option I do utilize occasionally. I can remember a time, when I would have argued FOR using those kind of pictures, but I have changed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
This is precisely the reason why there are other threads in which people complain that we don't have to care or concern ourselves with things happening elsewhere. That's a very dim, narrow, and poor way to treat everyone else on the planet. People are too protected, and that's why they have so much fear.
I haven't read through any of those threads. I wouldn't want to. I couldn't keep up with it either because I would have so much to say...and I can't type fast enough for this thread, let alone a thread like that. I feel sorry for folks that believe we shouldn't care about the world. I AGREE with you that that is a pretty dim, narrow, and poor way to treat everyone else on the planet. I don't think people are too protected though. If anything this world is one hell of a lot rougher than what it used to be. We're anything but protected. 20 years ago, if I was setting behind a car honking my horn to get the driver to realize the light changed, and go..... The worse that would have happened might have been a few choice words yelled at me, or better yet, that person probably would have shot me the bird. Now? That same situation could get me shot, or worse. There wasn't a thing called road rage back then either. We called them maniacs, or for lack of a better term - just plain assholes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Well, you seem to think it's a popular opinion that the body is female, so I'm just going with it.
Thank You.... That part of the discussion is now *closed*.



Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Sarcasm is hardly ever necessary, that's it nature. It is, however, a very valid form of expression, so I have no idea why you're taking umbrage to it. I've debated with many people before you, and will likely continue to do so for quite a long time, and I can say that I have never (and will never) "ride [someone's] ass" just because they have a different opinion on something. Especially on such a trivial matter as this. I know what tact is, thanks, but I don't see anything that qualifies as tactless. To be sure, I am human and have had my share of tactless posting here or there, but this is not one of those times. I'm not singling you out, i'm responding directly to something you posted. It happens all the time. Someone posts soemthing, someone responds to it. Not that tough a concept. I keep responding to you, because we are engaged in a debate here.
It had to do with the context in which you were using your sarcasm, and the condescending way you were "expressing yourself". Is sarcasm a valid form of expression? It depends on who you talk to. It is acceptable? Sometimes yes, and sometimes no. For me, as long as I don't think the person is talking down to me, it's ok... It's pretty clear to me that our views are very different.....I can remember when my views differed, and still do differ with those older than me. And no it's not just about age, it's more about priorities. To me it was personal, the things you were saying, and how you were saying them. In my mind, the way you were expressing yourself did take a personal tone, and therefore I responded in like fashion. But, it is VERY clear to me that the tone you are using now, is much less abrasive and condescending than your previous post. You say you were just responding to something I posted.....and you are ok with what you posted in response.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seer666
That is not shocking or graffic. It shows thigns HOW THEY ARE. if people can't face that, then they need to shut the fuck up and get a good reality check before they open their mouths again.
...And my response:

Quote:
Originally Posted by texxasco
Say...what a vocabulary... Fuck... what an interesting work. I once listened to a guy tell a story, and in the space of say 10 minutes, I heard him say the word FUCK better than 25 times. Any chance you two are related?
I didn't view my response here as harsh or abrasive, (a little sarcastic maybe, but not harsh), and I wasn't talking down to him..at least in my opinion. In fact, I was telling this person in the nicest way possible that I took issue with his statement. To me your response to me was much harsher than mine to him. What's becoming clear to me is that here in TFP right and wrong aren't clearly defined. I can write one thing and be wrong, yet you can write something similar and it's ok. To me things are more black and white, and what's wrong for one is wrong for another. Plain and simple, and fair is fair.

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
I'm not obsessed with seeing your words on the screen or anything. I didn't have an issue with what StanT said, which is why I didn't have reason to respond. You two have different opinions, and his is fine with me. Yours, I took issue with.
That's pretty obvious

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
And here's some constructive criticism, since apparently you've been wanting and i've denied you... accusing people of a laundry list of nonsense isn't the best way to debate with people. None of what I said was personal to you, yet you are responding directly to me in a very personal way. This behavior, on these boards, is tactless, because we try to strive for a higher level of debate, away from petty personal bickering.

Like I said previously, I viewed your comments as beyond debating, and more of a personal nature.



Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
If you think this was a tough debate, my constructive criticism would also include not going anywhere near the politics forum. This is Sesame Street in comparison. Also, there is more than one use of the word "argument"... and "arguing" is not the same thing. I'm not arguing with anybody. An argument is your case in a debate. That's how it was used in my context, and that's how it was meant.
No I don't think this is a tough debate, but to be quite honest with you it has gotten pretty old. Especially knowing it all started with a damn picture. I really don't even give a shit about it anymore. And no I won't be going around any political debates. I learned a long time ago that there were two areas that It was best I not converse with folks too much...Those being religion, and politics. I am a conservative republican who regularly attends church.... right away that would put me in the middle of controversy should I decide to debate on those topics. I also know my limitations, and would rather just leave those subjects alone. I keep my views, and others keep theirs.

In every conversation, debate, argument, there comes a time when two people have to agree to disagree. I know my limit, and I am now at it. We live in completely different worlds there analog. I guess I am a little neanderthal in my ways, but in my world I have to be. I get paid to socialize with people that most folks wouldn't or are too scared to deal with. If you're ever in my neck of the woods, stop by and I'll see about getting you a tour of "my" reality..or at least what is for 40 hours a week. I promise to not let the bad guys get you, if you'll promise to tell me if someone using bigger words than I do is making me look like a dumbass and I don't catch it.


I don't have enough patience to carry on a good debate for very long, and I can be too defensive sometimes whether I need to be or not. You're a good debater. A smartass too... but I like you. Yes, that is very personal.... but I mean it as a compliment, and not in a derogitory manner. Honest. You know, after all that hs been said back and forth in this debate, I believe giving credit where credit is due. I admire a person with enough balls to speak their mind.

I offer you a truce - hell you can even say you won if you want. That's ok. Either way, I am checking out of this conversation... Enough is enough man...

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Oh, and i'm a guy, since you weren't sure.
I kinda figured so, but I wasn't sure, and I didn't want to offend anybody.
__________________
...A Bad Day of Fishing is Better Than a Great Day at Work!
texxasco is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360