View Single Post
Old 09-08-2005, 02:36 PM   #115 (permalink)
SirLance
Junkie
 
SirLance's Avatar
 
Location: In the middle of the desert.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
Yes, I seem to remember that.
/sarcasm

I assume you interpret "shall not be infringed" to mean something different than the definitions in the dictionary.
No, but what the framers actually meant by "the people" (whether it refers to individuals or the states) has been hotly debated over the years. Your individual right to bear arms may not equate to your state's right to maintain a militia.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
I'm not quite sure why you're explaining this to me. I'd have preferred an explanation on the propriety of the government forcing, for example, an 80-year-old widow to rent to someone that daily violates that widow's religious beliefs.
The reason I discuss property rights in my post is because the second amendment has no relevence to this situation. The property rights enjoyed by Conoco to regulate what happens on their property take precedence. The Amendment speaks to what the GOVERNMENT can do. Not what a private property holder can allow or prohibit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
That's what's being debated in this thread. However, the second amendment was intended to do exactly that. And to act as a check upon oppressive governments.
Your contention about what the second amendment protects is wrong, but your contention as to it's purpose (and that of most of the bill of rights) is exactly correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
All of which are provided at company expense, unlike personal firearms.
This is not germane.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
That's the whole point. We're debating whether or not this company policy violates the second amendment.
That's my point. It doesn't. Conoco is not a governmental entity, therefore their refusal to allow firearms on their property is not a violation of the second amendment.

You also have to understand that an overwhelming public interest can preclude certain rights, which is why you can't take your gun into a courthouse. In this case, the interest is public safety.
__________________
DEMOCRACY is where your vote counts, FEUDALISM is where your count votes.
SirLance is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360