Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Suave
It is not abusing the language; it is a very important difference in paradigm between groups of people. Philosophical discussions are quite useless without good communication. A physicist would likely agree with you, but I'll bet a lot of biologists would state the "abusive", as you call it, definition.
|
As a biologist, I would have to go, no, that is retarded. Perhaps you would care to venture an entreaty with some philosophy gurus who are on what applesaucemcgee was when he started this post.
Also, Robaggio is completely accurate in definining his perspective, you are simply - no, purposefully refusing to understand what he has plainly said. Also, I've found that using the word paradigm makes the person sound like a pompous jackass.