View Single Post
Old 09-02-2005, 06:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
irateplatypus
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
Quote:
Originally Posted by politicophile
Are we winning the War on Terror? Let’s begin by defining the terms of the question. By “we”, we mean the United States primarily, and the “coalition of the willing” more generally. This does not include France, Russia, China, Germany, Spain, etc, but does include the United States, England, Australia, and Cameroon. Next, we must define what “winning” means.
i enjoyed reading your comments, but i think you hamstrung the discussion from the very beginning with this definition.

the "coalition of the willing" is a moniker used by politicians to describe the countries involved in our iraq operations, not the GWOT in total of which the french, germans, indians, japanese, polish and spanish etc. all play an active role in.

so "we" should really encompass nearly all civilization in the context of GWOT. of course, i firmly believe our iraq operations are a vital component to the overall goal winning the GWOT... but that's just a single front in the whole undertaking.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37