Now hold on - I didn't say you supported what he said, I asked you to explain in more detail what the difference is between them. You have replied, stating that the difference is that people have actually done what Osama asked them to do, while Robertson so far doesn't have the pursuasion skills to actually get anyone to do his bidding.
But it's still not a principle is it?
Equating one man calling for the death of another, to another man calling for the death of someone else seems perfectly reasonable to me. They are the same thing. I completely condemn both of them by the way. Both are morally reprehensible. But they are also exactly the same thing.
I have not insulted anyone who was unlucky enough to be in the WTC on 911, or anyone who was in the Bali bomb, or at any of the Iraqi checkpoints or on a London tube. Please calm down and look at the issue from a reasonable, factual perspective.
Robertson is WRONG, Osama is WRONG - they are the same. It is a matter of principle.