Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CSflim
Why on earth would anyone want to define 'sound' as 'the perception of (what is normally considered) sound'. Unless of course that person wanted to do violence to the language just to win an argument.
If you are abusive enough to your langauge, you can "win" just about any philosophical argument.
|
yeah yeah - it was a frivilous comment and I don't want to thread hijack, 'sound' is the vibration not the perception of vibration, so the tree still makes a 'sound'