Thats funny host. I read that article and the only FACT that was disputed was the name of the airport greeter - where there may, or may not, be a confusion over names. Your article doesn't go one to say it WAS a confusion over names, just that that is a likely possibility.
But I see none of the other ascertations were challenged. Hayes's sources were riddiculed because the intelligence community had already viewed them. And his book was described as propaganda because of who was promoting it.
But why aren't the claims hayes makes discounted?
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
|