|
I wish the drug companies would get sued for price-fixing, but not for something like this.
I can't believe that the pathologist's testimony was allowed. "I can't find a clot, but that's what he died of"? Give me a break.
How do you award $253 million when the pathologist can't show a clear-cut cause and effect?
This begs for an appeal. I think the jury made their decision just because they were all pissed over high drug prices.
Being pissed is justifiable. $253 million in this case isn't.
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
Margaret Thatcher
|