|
AVOR is right on in everything that was stated. These must have been some really bad facts. Can't really tell from the article, but I'll add though, that in addition to bad facts, either the doctor or his lawyers must have somehow pissed off the jurors, or there was a huge discrepancy in the quality of the economic experts used. Even bad facts, by themself, usually don't lead to verdicts in this range anymore.
|