|
host - a few articles from 4 years ago about whether there may or may not have been a threat against AF1 has no bearing on this discussion at all. What are you trying to prove? That the Bush administration planned 9/11, or at least was complacent in letting 9/11 happen so they could further their neo-con agenda? Is that it? Yeah, you really figured that one out.
zen tom, et al.- The part that the article and the left have in common are the "LIES LIES LIES" part. All I needed to justify the war in iraq was a speach bush gave after 911 where he said you are either with us or with the terrorists and if you are with the terrorists we will get you. Well, saddam was definately involved in terrorism, whether you want to believe it or not, and yes, the world is safer now that he doesn't rule iraq with impunity. I have no doubt saddam had knowledge of 9/11 before it happened and I have no doubt that if we didn't remove him he would have covertly done everything within his power to aid another terrorist attack in this country.
but then if I lived in bermuda I might have a different POV.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
|