I have a policy regarding violence towards people. Man or woman you are subject to the same policy; it's silly to create such a gap. Violence is necessitated or it isn't, gender doesn't matter in that regard, nor do I see why it should.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
Yes, a male should be able to defend themselves, but having to defend yourself against someone most likely weaker than you is silly.
|
This is why violence should be judged on a case by case basis, as any standing policy, regarding the validity of violence, that is based on supposition is flawed right from the get go. The recipient of violence is either less combat ready than you or not, seems rather sexist to assume any woman is less than unless otherwise indicated.