WTF is this? Two of them are now claiming Jackson was really guilty of molestation, and are indignant because he got off... and they are mad, I tell you, they are stomping their feet and will tell you all about it in their upcoming books!
link
Someone explain this idiocy to me. If they were convinced he was guilty, um, why did they vote to aquit?
juror Eleanor Cook, with a book to sell, asked if other jurors would be angry with her for slamming them for aquitting Jackson, just like she did, responded
Quote:
|
"They can be as angry as they want to. They ought to be ashamed. They're the ones that let a pedophile go," responded Cook, 79.
|
juror Ray Hultman, also "writing" a book, is indignant at the jury that let the pedophile go free. Nevermind he voted to aquit.
Quote:
|
"The thing that really got me the most was the fact that people just wouldn't take those blinders off long enough to really look at all the evidence that was there."
|
from my limited reading of news articles of the Jackson case, I would have voted to aquit. My anger is at these morons who did examine every piece of evidence, reach a conclusion, and for some bizarre reason, are indignant about the conclusion they themselves reached and voted for. It's scary that idiots such as these specimens are allowed to sit in judgment of another human.
Even more disgusting that they're trying to profit from it.