Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv

This statement is pretty amazing, considering that from "day one," Bush has been talking about a worldwide organization of terrorists, and saying the struggle would be a long one.




You missed the news reports on the Taliban?



Which is why I still can't see the logic in your statement that Bush put us into the position of needing to kill him, oh wait, not needing to kill him, okay, maybe we should kill him.

OBL attacked US! I haven't seen any arguments to the contrary in months. The president had the choice of a) ignoring the attack, like Clinton, or b) putting a price on his head, dead or alive.

What problem do you have with that?