View Single Post
Old 07-29-2005, 11:27 PM   #49 (permalink)
alansmithee
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by politicophile
Not so, sir. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that, If I am unable to offer alternatives to affirmative action, then I support the institutionalized racism that currently exists. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, in my continuing quest to find a substitute to affirmative action, I have been unable to answer the following critical question. Are you able to shed some light on it for me?

Question: What is the purpose of affirmative action?

If we are not able to answer this question with a straight-forward response (The purpose of affirmative action is [X, Y, Z, blah blah]), then not only will I not be able to come up with a viable alternative to "aa", but any justifications you have for the program's continued existence will inevitibly fail.

This is a question for everyone out there, so please feel free to respond!
The purposes of AA as I see them:

1. To help counteract the ingrained racism/sexism that exists/has existed in many workplaces and colleges by enabling minorities/women access to those institutions. This in turn leads to

2. Helping correct the economic imbalance that is suffered by many minorities/women due to being denied free access to economic opportunities for approx. 300 years (for blacks) and 250 years (for women).


They are largely intertwined. Because white males had around a 200 year head start, even in areas where there isn't current racism the effects are gravely felt. In many ways, poverty is now seen as part of black culture. Also, because for so many years blacks weren't allowed to make their own way, it has become difficult for them to do so now.

AA isn't an answer for racism, but it is something that helps mitigate the effects of racism. It's not an antibiotic, but a painkiller. It's also why I don't take seriously people who argue against racism on the terms of it being discriminatory. These people aren't arguing against discrimination, they are arguing against being discriminated against and no longer being sole beneficiaries of discrimination.
alansmithee is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360