Quote:
|
I don't understand that statement. Could you expound on why the war on terror would be for naught?
|
Ok. Osama was supposed to be the target from day one. But we all know he shifted it to Iraq to avenge daddykins. What would be the purpose of the war on terror if he was dead? There wouldn't be "anyone" to go after anymore.
Quote:
|
They will do so whether or not he's alive.
|
True, but I predict that if word got out that he's been killed, al-quidas recruitment numbers will jump significiantly so people sympathetic to him would help avenge his death because from their point of view, the infidels killed one of their freedom fighters. And that would make things worse.
According to Bush. When the target was osama that is. What was it? September 13 that Bush blamed it on Osama and declared war on al-quida? That caused our media to focus on him as if he alone carried out the attack himself. We all know that isn't the case, but our media didn't make that abundantly clear.
Quote:
|
Looks like I need still another explanation. How did "Bush and company" put us into the situation of needing/not needing to kill him?
|
Reading this makes me think that you are either playing dumb just to see what type of response you'll get or you actually been hiding under a rock for the past 3.5 years. To answer your question, Bush declared war on him and his followers! Americans wanted to see him dead. You know, our lustrous thirst for revenge? Dead or alive rewards were issued in the aftermath of the attacks.