This is a classic case of double standards - first you say:
Quote:
|
Trying to understand lends the impression that terrorist acts can be justified, which is an opinion that many people would find unpatriotic.
|
Then, you state:
Quote:
|
There is no room for hate crimes against muslims. I can understand them, but they are wrong.
|
So, if you are able to say that something is understandable and wrong (presuming that wrong is another way of saying 'unjustifiable'), can you see how trying to understand terrorist acts can be done without also justifying them?