|
People here have a habit of quoting, bullet-style, arguments that they disagree with. They label each phrase with one of the above described fallacies, as if putting a label on a tactic is a refutation. It's not - and it really comes off as a weak response if there isn't more content accompanying the labels. I'm only saying this to plead that posters don't start limit their replies to lists of fallacies "calling out" their opponents. As it is, it seems that we are already excavating below the bottom of the barrel when setting a tone for our discourse.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|