Quote:
Of course. We WILL be attacked again, but so far, recent methods of deterring them have been far more effective than all of Bill Clinton's appeasement. For empirical evidence, Google "terrorist attacks" during the time of his presidency.
|
Assuming your statement here is accurret (which I don't believe, especially if you consider certain bombings in Iraq and Afganistan) correlation does not mean causation. Given the fact we are in a war in two countries in the middle east that has put the focus of the terrorists to act within those countries and most of the time people don't count bombings in those countries as official terrorist attacks do you think it is possible that your link between Clinton could be wrong? This is just one plausible reason.