Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
We're not up in arms that he's not attracted to someone. We're up in arms over the fact that instead of saying "I'm not attracted to her" he has to say "she's a fugly cockblocker," and then later ammends that to "well not fugly, but she's a butterface." It's all about respect for your fellow human beings, and this guy obviously hasn't developed any.
The community prides itself so much on respect. We say "I don't agree with you" rather than "you're a fucktard." Why is it then surprising that we object when someone comes out being blatantly disrespectful of this individual? Not only is he being disrespectful to her, but he is being disrespectful to all women. He is in essence saying "I group women into two categories. Attractive, and ugly. I try to score with the attractive ones, but while I'm pleasant to the ugly girl's face, when she's not looking I talk down about her to anyone who will listen. Furthermore, a woman's value is based at least in large part on how attractive she is." Crap like that is not, nor should it be, tolerated around here.
|
^ ^ ^
| | |
w00p there it is!
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspikes51
I got the impression that he didn't like the girl because she was annoying.
|
So if someone is being annoying it is okay to say respectfully that someone is "fugly" or "sorry... maybe she's not really fugly, but more butterface"
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Last edited by Cynthetiq; 07-20-2005 at 08:45 PM..
|